Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/fforg/public_html/cancervictors.net/components/com_jaggyblog/router.php on line 156

Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/fforg/public_html/cancervictors.net/components/com_jaggyblog/router.php on line 205
Mammograms offer no health benefits whatsoever, doctors conc

Mammograms offer no health benefits whatsoever, doctors conc

An Australian team from the University of Queensland see little, if any, benefit in screening women under 50 years of age, but they do point out some of the serious negative effects - later ill effects from the radiation they are exposed to during the mammogram, the possibility that an existing tumor may spread due to the pressure exerted on the breast during screening, and the anxiety caused by frequent false- positive results. The Canadian researchers point out that a false-positive result may not only produce great stress, but may also lead to unnecessary biopsies and surgery. They also point out that mammography misses 10-15 per cent of early breast cancers thus providing a false sense of security.

Mammograms offer no health benefits whatsoever, doctors conclude

Danish researcher Dr. Peter Gotzsche first made this claim in a study published in "The Lancet" in October 2006. Gotzsche had re-analyzed the studies originally done on the benefits of mammograms and found them unconvincing. Since then, other doctors have begun to assert that in addition to failing to offer protection, mammograms — which involve exposing patients to radiation —may actually increase women's risk of cancer. "The latest evidence shifts the balance towards harm and away from benefits," said Dr. Michael Baum of University College in London. Gifford-Jones also points to other risks, from the physical to the psychological. According to some authorities, the squeezing of women's breasts during mammograms may rupture blood vessels, causing cancer to spread to other parts of the body and actually increasing a patient's risk of death. He also pointed to the trauma suffered by women who receive false positives from their mammograms, and to the dangerous sense of security felt by those who receive false negatives. 

Mammography Madness

Some years ago a British surgeon blasted American doctors as "immoral" for screening women under 50 for breast cancer. On a visit to the Long Island Jewish Hospital Medical Center Dr. Baum said the screening was "opportunistic" and did more harm than good. "Over 99 percent of premenopausal women will have no benefit from screening. Even for women over 50, there has been only a one percent biopsy rate as a result of screening in the United Kingdom. The density of the breast in younger women make mammography a highly unreliable procedure." (Medical Tribune, 3/26/92)

A yet unpublished Canadian study even suggests, the rumor goes, that younger women are more likely to die if they expose themselves to mammograms instead of just relying on physical breast exams. The investigators say this earlier finding has not proven to be true but Dr. Cornelia Barnes of the University of Toronto said: "We will not say that mammography kills. The conclusion that will be reached is that younger women do not benefit [by having a reduced mortality]." (Emphasis added.)

Dr. Barnes said the danger of early mammograms is not from radiation but from false-positive results that can lead to unnecessary biopsies, resulting in scar tissue that can make subsequent mammograms more difficult to read. more

"Screening mammography poses significant and cumulative risks of breast cancer for premenopausal women. The routine practice of taking four films of each breast annually results in approximately 1 rad (radiation absorbed dose) exposure, about 1,000 times greater than that from a chest x-ray. The premenopausal breast is highly sensitive to radiation, each 1 rad exposure increasing breast cancer risk by about 1 percent, with a cumulative 10 percent increased risk for each breast over a decade's screening. These risks are even greater for younger women subject to "baseline screening." Dr. Mercola

Benefits of mammogram are being questioned
Breast cancer screening may cause more harm than good

Do you have a question or need guidance?  Patricia Wilson volunteers her time to provide guidance and support in your quest to find relevant information.   She can be reached at  281-581-2424 or 206-222-1619 (USA) or  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;subject=Question%20for%20Patricia" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(10, 62, 105);">click here to email PatriciaThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;subject=Question%20for%20Patricia" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(10, 62, 105);">click here to email Patricia .


Los Angeles Times April 28, 2001Key Breast Cancer Study Was a Fraud : A key study pointing to the effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplants in treating metastatic breast cancer was based on faked data, cancer experts said Thursday. The American Society of Clinical Oncology announced that an unscrupulous South African researcher, Dr. Werner Bezwoda, has led thousands of women with breast cancer to undergo expensive, debilitating and often fatal bone marrow transplants. His data were fraudulent..."

FDA Advisory Committee Urged To Reject Zeneca's application of Tamoxifen For Preventing Breast Cancer in Healthy Women as the Drug is Ineffective and Dangerous. more

After running her own successful business in Wellness Alternatives, Pamela Hoeppner faced the unthinkable. She was diagnosed with a malignant, fast-growing breast cancer. Pam declined all conventional treatment and chose an alternative approach with an impressive track record instead, which resulted in her full recovery. Convinced that mutilation and toxic treatments are not always necessary she wanted others to know there ARE options that don't involve devastating a person's body and their quality of life. In her inspiring book, The Breast Stays Put, with a delivery all her own, she shares her courageous story of overcoming a deadly diagnosis, and provides prevention and treatment information

David Brownstein, MD - "The Breast Stays Put is a wonderfully written first-hand account of how one woman overcame her life-threatening diagnosis of cancer using only alternative medicine.  I believe this is a must read for anyone diagnosed with breast cancer, I highly recommend it to anyone interested in learning more about treating cancer with alternative therapies." 


Transfer Factors and Breast Cancer

Duane Townsend, M.D. - "I'm a cancer physician. I have many cancer patients on transfer factors, along with traditional treatment protocols. I believe that transfer factors has been very beneficial to these patients. I primarily treat female cancer and certainly encourage my patients who are undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy to take transfer factors. It helps to modulate the immune system. I have patients with chronic herpes infections who are taking transfer factors on a regular basis and it's reducing the number of outbreaks. I've also had patients with chronic yeast infections, and the transfer factors has reduced their infections as well. Transfer factors is a science-based product with data from a variety of researchers." Dr. Townsend is the former Director of Gynecologic Oncology and Gynecologic Endoscopy at LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah. He has authored over 90 papers in peer review journals and fifteen chapters in books. Dr. Townsend created a well-known procedure in dealing with precancer of the cervix.

Dr. Townsend has had more than 32 years of distinguished experience in the medical field. He pioneered a surgical technique for the treatment of pre-malignant disease of the uterine cervix. In addition, he has authored more than 90 scientific papers in peer review journals as well as over 15 chapters in research books.

Ann Lane was diagnosed with Hodgkin's cancer. The tumor mass filled her rib cage. Her immune system dropped into the 2,000 range. She began her chemotherapy regimen along with a nutritional protocol (containing transfer factors) along with the traditional therapies administered by her physician. Ann's blood work revealed that 30 days after beginning her nutritional protocol (including transfer factors), her immune system went up to and maintained a level ranging between 4,200 and 7,200. Ann believes that the nutrition, especially transfer factors improved the effectiveness of her immune system, and that made the difference and possibly saved her life.

Effects of Dialyzable Transfer Factor in Patients with Breast Cancer  Five patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with pooled dialyzable transfer factors from healthy adult donors. The period of treatment ranged from 21 to 310 days, the total dose from 20 to 257 ml. Transfer factors did not elicit inflammatory or hypersensitivity reactions or detectable formation of antibody to itself, nor any hematological or biochemical abnormalities or other side effects. Three patients became responsive (by skin test) to tuberculin and/or streptococcal antigens. Marked partial regression of the breast cancer, lasting 6 months, was observed in one patient.